Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
The Moses Firm The Moses Firm
  • Get Trusted Legal Advice Today!

Woman Awarded $1.3M After Doctors Fail To Diagnose Injury

Money

A jury awarded a patient $1.3 million after suffering multiple strokes following a carotid dissection. Carotid dissection means that the artery inside her body was bleeding. The hospital performed a CT scan but did not uncover any problems. The woman’s symptoms appeared to be abating as she was presenting to the emergency room. However, she was still experiencing numbness.

At this point, the hospital discharged the patient without further testing. Several hours later, the patient suffered a stroke. Had the physicians ordered further testing, they would have noticed the carotid dissection. They did not.

Essentially, a carotid dissection is a hole in the artery which causes it to bleed out. If left untreated, the injury will cause a clot to form which will lead to a catastrophic stroke. In these cases, there is a small window to act before the stroke occurs. The doctors should have ordered the MRI to rule out a carotid dissection.

The hospital denied committing negligence and claimed she suffered no permanent injuries. However, the patient was able to prove to the jury that she did suffer permanent injuries. The jury did not buy the hospital’s argument that it did not commit negligence.

Understanding medical negligence 

Plaintiffs in medical malpractice lawsuits must prove that the doctor who treated them violated the prevailing standard of care for their profession. So, if most doctors or the medical standard states that you have to rule out carotid dissection when a patient presents with such-and-such symptoms and your failure to do so results in serious injury, then you are liable under the law for all of the patient’s injuries.

At this point, the doctor would be asked the reason why they did not follow up with an MRI to rule out carotid dissection. If their answer did not have something to do with the patient’s condition becoming worse by running the test, chances are good that the doctor deviated from the prevailing standard of care.

Of course, doctors sometimes find themselves in situations where they’re being blamed for something that would have happened anyway. However, that is not the case here. An MRI would have spurred the hospital to address the carotid dissection before it caused a catastrophic stroke. The patient’s outcome was better than you’d expect. She was able to return to work but still has limited mobility in one of her hands. Nonetheless, the patient does not have her full quality of life and could have had the hospital correctly tested for the patient’s condition.

Ultimately, a jury found that the defendant failed to act in accordance with the prevailing standard of care when they did not follow up with secondary testing.

Talk to an Atlanta, GA Medical Malpractice Attorney 

The Moses Law Firm represents the interests of injured patients in medical malpractice lawsuits. Call our Atlanta medical malpractice lawyers today to schedule a free consultation and learn more about how we can help.

Source:

readingeagle.com/2022/10/12/berks-reading-hospital-1-3-million-medical-malpractice-lawsuit/

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Skip footer and go back to main navigation